The primary beliefs of vaccinology are that it is possible to educate the immune system to protect against disease, that vaccines are safe and that smallpox was eradicated. It is quite possible to be very confident about the first points and still be able to question the evidence for the last one.
WHO
Open Letter to the WHO re: recognition of vaccine side effects
Please read the Open Letter to the WHO authored by several concerned action groups here in the UK, with regards to an ICD recognition of C0VID-19 vaccine-induced side effects and related disorders.
WHO Decides? Part 3: The line between good and evil
Over the last few decades we have seen sound liberal principles become distorted and perverted until they are not worthy principles any more. In fact, many such perverted principles have run roughshod over other fundamental principles.
WHO Decides? Part 2: Data
Nation states have only months to decide not to commit to the amended WHO International Health Regulations and the Treaty that accompanies them. In part 1, we discussed the impact on your money, and here we will talk about the effect on your data, your privacy and your freedom.
WHO Decides? Part 1: Money
The world is at a crucial crossroads with imminent changes to the World Health Organisation (WHO). Many are aware of a proposed new treaty and maybe even the changes to the International Health Regulations, but what people might not be aware of are the plans for your money. Beliefs about what happened with covid are not relevant to this discussion. You could think that covid was the biggest public health disaster in history and these plans should still concern you.
Should the UK sign up to the proposed WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty?
Late last year HART was invited to be a co-signatory on an open letter to the relevant parliamentary scrutiny committees on the much vexed question of increasing WHO powers. The proposals are via a combination of changes to international health regulations, which require only a 51% majority of member states, and a wholescale change to the Treaty, which would require a two thirds majority.
Will the WHO regulation amendments do more harm than good?
HART was a co-signatory to an open letter to the UK House of Commons and House of Lords scrutiny committees regarding the impact of the proposed amendments to international health regulations. Dr David Bell, public health physician and senior scholar of the Brownstone Institute, has written a detailed synopsis of all the proposed changes – Amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations: An Annotated Guide.
How to nullify criticism of the vaccines
At a time when concerns about serious adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines are escalating, one might reasonably expect the World Health Organisation (WHO) – a specialised agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health – to take immediate and decisive action. Perhaps a recommendation to pause the vaccine rollout would be a reasonable step under the circumstances.
World Health Organization’s Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Treaty
These proposals are a major threat to our sovereignty and democracy The WHO has been flexing its muscles for several years but Covid-19 has provided a huge opportunity for mission creep. The latest in its quest for ever-increasing power is the proposed legally binding Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Treaty. Without even waiting for the […]
Open letter to HoC & HoL scrutiny committees
The WHO’s Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Treaty threatens our sovereignty and our democracy. HART has joined with The Thinking Coalition, Time for Recovery, Together Declaration, Not Our Future and Freedom Alliance to urge our parliamentary scrutiny committees to exercise due diligence.
The WHO power grab, what’s it all about and what can I do about it?
Many readers of this bulletin may have heard a lot of concern being raised about “the new pandemic treaty” being proposed by the WHO. Fewer will have heard about a separate – but equally concerning – development: proposed changes to the “International Health Regulations” which, potentially, could “bite” very quickly.
The WHO power grab — Medical Tyranny at scale
The World Health Organisation have launched a “historic global accord” for pandemics also known as a “pandemic treaty” to be decided by an “intergovernmental negotiating body.” The WHO General Assembly is able to pass binding agreements on all member states with a two thirds majority using article 19 of the WHO constitution.
