C-19 Inquiry a whitewash?

The report from UK C19 Inquiry Module 2 came out last week with MSM loudly repeating the ‘Too Little Too Late’ message, and the alt media talking of the predicted whitewash. But as blogger BiologyPhenom says, the detail of many of the witness testimonies is there on record. The whitewashing comes not only as predicted by Baroness Hallett and team, but by all those journalists who failing to cover the Inquiry itself and to highlight the care home deaths and the psychological warfare inflicted on the population without which we never would have reached the genetic ‘vaccines’.

Read More

C-19 Inquiry Module 8 – Children and Young People

‘‘It was recognised that government policies and measures were KNOWINGLY causing HUGE HARM to children and young people and that they were paying a HUGE price to protect the rest of society.’’  “There has been no proper explanation for such an EGREGIOUS FAILING…to have recognised that you are INTENTIONALLY doing something that is likely to cause harm…recognise that is IT IS causing harm and yet not having done the work to put in to mitigation or a reduction in those harms is simply inexplicable and has not been explained.’’ This from the KC to the NI Children’s Commissioner.

Read More

Comorbidity and death from or following Covid-19 in the Pfizer/BNT162b2 trial

A further analysis of the deaths in the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine trial – obesity stood out as the greatest danger in the comorbidities of the trial participants who died of or following Covid-19 reflect the metabolic health crisis affecting much of the world.
A unique and powerful opportunity to start tackling the metabolic health crisis and make long term health improvements in the UK was wasted.

Read More

Ofcom’s plan to extend its censorship role

The most crucial element to any large scale propaganda campaign is to ensure that dissenting voices, claims, and arguments never reach the light of day. It is apparent from this 2025 document – published to coincide with what Ofcom describes as its ‘year of action’ – that our national broadcasting regulator is eager to perform this pivotal role of omnipotent censor, ensuring that we only ever hear one, government-curated, version of the truth.

Read More

How safe is safe?

Safety concerns re Radiofrequency radiation continue. The WHO commissioned a series of systematic reviews on cancer, fertility problems and cognitive impairment, but a critique by the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Magnetic Fields has concluded that these reviews cannot be relied upon..

Read More

Covid-19 vaccines and cancer links: what is the evidence?

At the Reform Party Conference, Dr Aseem Malhotra controversially quoted an oncologist that it was “highly likely that the covid vaccines have been a significant factor in the cancers of members of the Royal Family.” Perhaps not surprisingly this created a media frenzy and renewed demands for him to be struck off by the GMC. HART looks again at the growing evidence supporting a link between mRNA vaccines and cancer.

Read More

Why did healthcare professionals disregard ethical guidance during the covid event? 

An earlier HART article described how, throughout the covid event, health care professionals (doctors, nurses, psychologists, behavioural scientists) habitually behaved in ways that were at odds with their ethical codes. The moral imperatives of delivering effective interventions, doing no harm, ensuring informed consent, avoiding perceived conflicts of interest, and whistle blowing upon witnessing unacceptable behaviour of colleagues, were all widely disregarded during the ‘pandemic’. In this second article, Gary Sidley explores the key reasons for this mass abandonment of ethical principles…

Read More