The Mysterious Case of the Disappearing Remote Control

1. “The design of the so called vaccines was intentionally to harm people” and he calls them “intentionally toxic.” Dr Yeadon is right that the people designing the product would have known that cell sacrifice was an integral part of their design. Many people were involved in the design and many of these people seemed to think sacrifice was necessary because they’d been terrified into believing there was a high mortality risk from covid.

2. “Not a single atom or molecule in a synthetic drug is in there by luck.” What was intended to be in the drug was not there by luck, but as Dr Yeadon points out later, “the methods development alone for the development of a reproducible manufacturing process itself takes a number of years.” The manufacturing was such that there were significant contaminants and degradation of the RNA which meant unknown proteins would be produced alongside the spike proteins.

3. “Denis Rancourt’s data shows that the all cause mortality evidence data did not increase at all in the run up to the Declaration.” While this is true there have been numerous covid-labelled death surges across the world which also appeared out of the blue. Like other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 surges in response to a seasonal trigger. HART agrees that there absolutely were excess deaths due to the unprecedented policies put in place at the time. People within HART do not all agree on what proportion of excess deaths can be attributed to virus versus policies (including with how people with an acute infection were treated). It is an important point for debate.

4. “An inappropriate fraudulent PCR test was used to give people the impression that they had a particular disease where they didn’t. They were all normal diseases.” PCR testing certainly resulted in overdiagnosis. Swapping out one causative virus for another could arguably be regarded as a new disease, however, the big picture suggests that in regard to acute respiratory infections as a whole, covid was similar to previous bad influenza seasons e.g. 1989, 1991, 2000.

5. “Lipid nanocarriers deposit their cargo, preferentially in the ovaries.” Lipid nanoparticles were designed to reach every cell of the body so they could replace genes missing in patients that needed gene therapy. The biodistribution studies do indeed show concentration in the ovaries, along with liver, adrenal glands and spleen at 48 hours but no studies have been carried out beyond that time point.

6. “17 million of whom have died so far.” This analysis included all excess – every covid-labelled death and every policy induced death after vaccination was rolled out. It therefore cannot be said to all be down purely to the vaccines. In the absence of the political response one must ask if we would have had any of this excess mortality? Denis Rancourt points out that there was a tight correlation between vaccine waves and excess mortality waves. Vaccination does indeed lead to immune suppression which increases the risk of infection and therefore transmission to others. However, vaccine waves were also driven by politicians in response to covid waves. The “17 million deaths caused by vaccines” claim is hyperbole that just increases polarisation in the same way the “20 million deaths caused by covid” claim did. The former is at least based on real world data but assumes there was no excess caused by any other aspects of the response. Given the ongoing increased mortality we may yet reach that figure but there is certainly uncertainty about how many have died because of vaccines at this point in time.