Today the Inquiry releases its module 4 report It is a difficult day today for the vaccine injured who have struggled to be heard. The following statement is from Caroline Pover who is the chair of trustees at the charity UKCV family. The charity will also be making a statement in response to the report. COVID […]
Tag: Censorship
An open letter to Mr Wes Streeting
Re: The GMC is Failing in its Duty to Protect the Public and Needs Urgent Reform.
Health professionals, academics and concerned citizens write to Wes Streeting to point out the huge discrepancies in GMC action against whistle blowers compared with doctors commiting sexual offences.
Comorbidity and death from or following Covid-19 in the Pfizer/BNT162b2 trial
A further analysis of the deaths in the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine trial – obesity stood out as the greatest danger in the comorbidities of the trial participants who died of or following Covid-19 reflect the metabolic health crisis affecting much of the world.
A unique and powerful opportunity to start tackling the metabolic health crisis and make long term health improvements in the UK was wasted.
Ofcom’s plan to extend its censorship role
The most crucial element to any large scale propaganda campaign is to ensure that dissenting voices, claims, and arguments never reach the light of day. It is apparent from this 2025 document – published to coincide with what Ofcom describes as its ‘year of action’ – that our national broadcasting regulator is eager to perform this pivotal role of omnipotent censor, ensuring that we only ever hear one, government-curated, version of the truth.
Our grave concerns about the handling of the COVID pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK, 21-08-2021
An open letter from 140 health professionals to the leaders of the 4 nations, regarding the catastrophic management of the covid pandemic.
Kangaroo Court?
Was Dr David Cartland a harrasser or the victim of a concerted onslaught? What of the case against him? Did it stack up or was it just a witch hunt? Since when did entering a spat on Twitter result in loss of your entire career?
My four-year inquisition for writing the truth on Covid-19 vaccine data
Niall McCrae was reported to the NMC by a ‘factchecker’ in March 2021 for a single article he had written, reporting on the phenomenon of increased civd infections in the first 10 days after vaccination (as published in a report from Public Health England). For this crime, he waited 4 years when on the first date of the hearing the NMC’s own legal team threw it out before Niall’s lawyer had even opened his mouth!
Free Speech in retreat
Ofcom’s Iron Grip shows the UK turn its back on British values In February 2025, a tense exchange unfolded in the Oval Office between UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US Vice President JD Vance. Vance challenged Starmer face-to-face, asserting that UK policies, like the Online Safety Act, infringe on free expression. Starmer swiftly countered, […]
Journal Gatekeeping:
Are medical journals increasingly acting as ‘gatekeepers’ to promote ‘established narratives’ but sideline research that challenges the status quo? Many articles containing ‘controversial’ views that initially achieved publication have been promptly retracted. In the past 5 years, the retraction of papers criticizing the covid vaccines or lockdown policies, for example, has gone stratospheric….
Victory for Dr. Charles Hoffe as Case Withdrawn After Lengthy Battle:
Dr Charles Hoffe, Family Doctor in British Columbia was suspended from his work three years ago when he reported on vaccine injuries in his patients. Finally the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia have dropped all their action against him, but only after he has racked up a huge legal bill. Why now?
People’s Vaccine Inquiry Press Conference
Members of the People’s Vaccine Inquiry held a Press Conference in London at the end of the UK Covid-19 Public Inquiry, Module 4 hearings. The aim was to look at many of the omissions and misinformation of the official Inquiry and give a public voice to the many dissenting health professionals and others who are far from convinced that these products
Smoke, mirrors and ghost writers
Smoke and Mirrors in scientific debate. All is not always what it seems and authors are not always who they purport to be.
RIP Dr Jackie Stone, The COVID Hero
On Thursday 3rd October 2024, Dr Jackie Stone ended her life and a light went out in the world. Hounded by the medical authorities for seeking to give her patients the best care she could offer and stripped of her medical licence and her raison d’être. A shocking indictment of the world we live in.
America’s Medical Monopoly: An Injection of Truth
The General Medical Council (GMC) is in overdrive, with medical professionals being erased from the register for ‘wrongspeak’. Yet this is not a new phenomenon. If we delve into the history of how our existing ‘medical monopoly’ was established, it is an all too familiar disturbing playbook of censorship, corruption and subversion of ethics that spans over 130 years in the making.
Peer Review:
Peer review is a system used by scientists and clinicians to decide which primary research or secondary (review/commentary) content is worthy of being published. In theory it is a process of cumulative, collective knowledge that through publications is cascaded from experts to readers. But in practice things are not always what they seem!
The Witch Hunt continues
The current situation of self-censorship amongst doctors combined with GMC overreach, risks serious ongoing harms to patients and must not continue.
The Academic Whistleblower
According to Dr Elliott, a bioethicist at the University of Minnesota, “individuals don’t stumble into whistleblowing; rather, they are reluctant casualties of a corrupted system.”
