One year ago, PJH Law, on behalf of HART, made a Freedom of Information request to the Medicines and Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency (MHRA), requiring all the data that was submitted by AstraZeneca in the application for licence of their Covid-19 vaccine.
Creating a social media profile and broadcasting to the world is not for everyone. Speaking the truth to your family, your friends and your colleagues is a fine place to start. In fact those conversations are worth many times more than communication through any screen.
Australia is an important control group because they had minimal covid prior to Omicron. Therefore the effects of the vaccine alone on the population can be deduced by what happened there in 2021.
A selection of articles that we feel are worth the time. ‘What should we learn for the future?’ Dr Scott Michell, The Guernsey press, 9th October: Dr Mitchell was an Emergency Care Physician at Princess Elizabeth Hospital in Guernsey. He became a member of the Frontline Covid Clinical Care Clinicians(FLCCC) and has signed many of HART‘s open letters cautioning against rolling out mRNA vaccines to children.
In 2021, HART raised the alarm about an increased risk of covid infection in the first two weeks after vaccination from multiple sources. The result was that those who were susceptible to the circulating variant, had their cases within two weeks of vaccination resulting in a lower infection risk in the period more than two weeks after vaccination. This created the illusion of efficacy.
All our readers will be aware that on October 20th, Andrew Bridgen managed finally to secure a debate on the Excess mortality which is occurring in the UK and across highly vaccinated countries in every continent. In the run up to the debate, HART joined in an open letter to all MPs urging them to attend and similar appeals were made by other groups most of which fell on deaf ears.
HART members are not the only people to be shocked at the double standards applied to three professors all appearing before Baroness Hallett last week. This topic has been covered in the Daily Sceptic and of course by Tom Jefferson in Trust the Evidence. But you really have to watch at least part of the day’s YouTube coverage to get a sense of the level of disrespect shown to Professor Carl Heneghan.
It’s that season again. As we wave goodbye to summer and enter the coughs-and-cold season – where sniffles are, inevitably, more common – the usual pro-mask suspects are, once again squealing for our attention.
In the study they critically fail to define “unvaccinated”. However, a clue comes from the fact that the sum of the “unvaccinated,” and those with two doses or three doses equals every one who tested positive (see figure 1). This presumably means that everyone who had been vaccinated but had not yet been “fully vaccinated” were described as “unvaccinated”. Of those who tested positive 91.5% were “fully vaccinated” or more.
More stealth damage from mRNAs shots? Also available on Substack – Come and join the conversation with open comments In Jan 2021 Yuichiro Suzuki and Sergiy Gychka, two scientists from Georgetown University, Washington DC, published an article which reviewed a number of studies in animals, including their own work. These raised a number of concerns, […]
“We have experienced more excess deaths since July 2021 than in the whole of 2020. Unlike during the pandemic, however, those deaths are not disproportionately of the old. In other words, the excess deaths are striking down people in the prime of life. No one seems to care.”
Since its inception, HART has concentrated its efforts on analysis of the pandemic and all the ramifications of the government response (and indeed that of governments across the world). But occasionally, other articles get sent to us which have some common features, in particular, whether some new technology really is as ‘SAFE’ as we are being told.
YouTuber John Campbell recently published a podcast pointing at excess mortality in countries with higher covid vaccination. Unfortunately, he unwisely referenced some poor-quality analysis which has resulted in various fact-‘checks’ from the BBC’s ‘More or Less’ and Health Feedback, an outfit that we encountered in November 2022 when they attempted a pretty poor hatchet job on Aseem Malhotra’s Journal of Insulin Resistance review articles.
When calling out the excess mortality after the covid vaccination campaign, the claim that Sweden disproves an association with vaccination is frequently raised. Why is it that Sweden has only a small excess, and some claim none when adjusted for age?