Moderna loses yet another legal challenge over its NextCOVE trial, the notorious study including healthy children in testing of a new booster and involving significant financial incentives. Refusing to produce the trial protocol for 2 years, they have now lost a Tribunal. This follows their embarrasing admonishment by the PMCPA..
News
Book Review: Managing A Pandemic
HART’s book reviewer turns to black humour:
Derek calls Yin at the national broadcaster again.
“We need to stop people questioning our lockdown policy… we will run a story comparing [this] to the Black Death. And release a daily stats bulletin exaggerating the number of people it has killed, using the questionable assumption that all deaths where the deceased tested positive for the virus within the past 30 days were indisputably caused by the virus. That should frighten people into compliance”.
“I’m not sure that’s wholly objective”, ponders Derek. “But I like it”.
Managing A Pandemic, published in 2025 by Berishmak
Let’s not forget the mass casualties of the covid RESPONSE – Part 2
Psychologist Dr Gary Sidley presents many personal testimonies to the negative consequences of extraordinary restrictions and practices during the covid event. Generalised descriptions often fail to impress upon the reader the extent of suffering and turmoil endured by the victims of these draconian interventions. Accounts from the Scottish Covid Inquiry (SCI) and other sources convey the depth of emotional impact of these impositions upon ordinary people.
WHO Pandemic Agreement ⏤
The WHO Pandemic Agreement has been finalised and is due for ratification by member states on 19th May, with a deadline for rejection in July. Will this have any benefit for people’s health or will it set the controls in place for future health tyrany? It is not too late to reject it.
A twist in the clot?
Suppose there had never been a public narrative of a novel virus – how might the rise in clotting-related deaths have been interpreted? Would we have examined alternative explanations more seriously?
The systemic virus myth
Much of the fear of covid is based on the idea that it behaves in a more dangerous way than other respiratory viruses. But where is the evidence for that?
Let’s not forget the mass casualties of the covid RESPONSE – Part 1
The ‘Covid day of reflection’ took place on the 9th of March 2025 to commemorate the victims of the ‘pandemic’. This article focuses here will be on a much larger, and often forgotten, group of victims of this era: those who were harmed or killed by the range of unprecedented and non-evidenced responses to a presumed novel virus.
Free Speech in retreat
Ofcom’s Iron Grip shows the UK turn its back on British values In February 2025, a tense exchange unfolded in the Oval Office between UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US Vice President JD Vance. Vance challenged Starmer face-to-face, asserting that UK policies, like the Online Safety Act, infringe on free expression. Starmer swiftly countered, […]
Pick of the Week April 3rd
A Scottish theme with posts from the Scottish Covid Inquiry as well as from the Scottish People’s Covid Inquiry and a critique of the covid vaccine exhibition at
The National Museum of Scotland
Journal Gatekeeping:
Are medical journals increasingly acting as ‘gatekeepers’ to promote ‘established narratives’ but sideline research that challenges the status quo? Many articles containing ‘controversial’ views that initially achieved publication have been promptly retracted. In the past 5 years, the retraction of papers criticizing the covid vaccines or lockdown policies, for example, has gone stratospheric….
OPEN LETTER OF CONCERN 4 March 2025
Reproduced with kind permission of the author, this open letter to the Chief Veterinary Officer (the Chris Whitty of the chicken world) questions the whole scientific basis for PCR testing of poultry for avian flu.
Pick of the Week – 12th March 2025
More mRNA products in the pipeline
More on DNARs & care home deaths
And an international meeting from Canada
Regarding the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme – An Open Letter to the Press
HART publishes two letters from Jonathan Hall to the Press regarding their lack of detailed investigation of the woefull inadequate Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme.
Covid vaccine injured – Silent no More
Was taking the Covid vaccine Worth a Shot? A new book by Caroline Pover, written on behalf of Brianne Dressen who lives in the USA, chronicles the horrific story of how she was severely injured by the Covid vaccine after enrolling on the AstraZeneca trial in November 2020. Caroline sensitively and professionally tells the heart wrenching, eye-opening account of how Brianne Dressen’s life was turned upside down and irreversibly changed forever the day she chose to volunteer to enroll on the UK-led AstraZeneca clinical trial. This book takes the reader along the rollercoaster ride of the devastating injuries caused by the vaccine and the blatant abuse of power by the healthcare system to denigrate, ignore, and cover up her injuries – along with many others labelled – as ‘misinformation’ spreaders by the medical-industrial-military complex.
Covid Inquiry Module 4 revisited
This is a detailed report from the People’s Vaccine Inquiry meeting in London on 4th February, which aimed to highlight omissions and distortions from the official Public Inquiry.
The Flawed Assessment of VDPS Claims
The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) is often portrayed as a financial lifeline for those suffering from vaccine-related injuries. However, upon closer examination, the system appears fundamentally flawed, leaving many without the support they desperately need. Instead of functioning as a proper compensation scheme, the VDPS serves as a temporary measure, intended only to provide interim financial assistance until claimants can pursue legal redress. Given the significant legal barriers and reluctance of courts to hear such cases in the UK, this supposed route to justice remains largely inaccessible.
