Drug safety regulation appears to be a lone wolf in the world of safety regulation. The aviation sector doesn’t ignore safety incidents “because they are outweighed by the benefits” and nor should the drug regulators. The aviation baseline is “less than 1 fatal accident per 1 million flying hours”. The alarm bells ring as soon as there is 1 fatal accident. Actually, even a near-miss gets them excited.
Posts
Gender ideology: What’s happening in the rest of the UK?
Gender ideology has been topical in England in recent years, with significant happenings, such as The Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) at the Tavistock Clinic closing, the banning of puberty blockers being prescribed to children, and the release of the recent CASS report, which highlighted the lack of a clear evidence base for allowing children to change sex. In a further shift of policy, NHS England has rightly stated that biological sex is fact and should be respected in hospital settings.
Pick of the Week – May 3rd 2024
Our weekly round-up of worthwhile articles.
What did the MHRA do to ensure no harm came from production of unknown proteins following mRNA injections?
In November 2023, a team from Cambridge published their research which showed that the vaccine mRNA did not just lead to spike protein production. The code could slip such that any number of unknown proteins could be produced. They demonstrated the problem by showing an immune response to one of the potential “off target” proteins.
HART Ethics
Several members of HART are authors of a new pre-print on ethics. It takes an in-depth look at the historical and ethical framework that has guided medical practices for centuries—from the Hippocratic Oath to modern legal standards like the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Then and Now
The account below was sent in to us by a HART follower who works in a busy A&E department, comparing the workload and the treatment options in the spring of 2020 with that of 2024. Here we reproduce it in full, with some added links to previous HART articles.
Conflicts in Cancer Data
Many of our readers will be aware of the claims of a rise in cancers since the vaccine rollout, particularly among the young. Last week we published an article discussing the scientific rationale why a rise in cancers might be expected after the vaccine rollout. The data published by the UK on this topic is contradictory but data from around the world is signifying there is a genuine problem.
Covid-19 Response and Excess Deaths
On 18th April, Andrew Bridgen finally secured a full length debate on this vexed topic, the original text of which is available here. Full length in theory, but shortly before the debate was due to begin, the deputy Speaker told him he only had 15 minutes instead of the 30 minutes he had prepared. After a complaint to the Speaker’s office the compromise was 20 minutes.
Pick of the Week – 26 April 2024
A selection of articles we think are worth your time.
Book Review – Will Ellsworth-Jones’ We Will Not Fight (2008)
Like with so much history that is shrouded by the mists of time, the detailed tales of the thousands of British men who refused to fight in the First World War make for fascinating reading. These conscientious objectors came from all walks of life – socialists, communists, pacifists, Quakers, Jehovah’s witnesses, Methodists, the Bloomsbury Set – and found a unity of purpose in their protest, allowing them – for a time being at least – to put aside quite substantial ideological differences.
Covid-19: Response and Excess Deaths
You can watch the entire debate on Parliamentary TV archives, Timestamp: 14:33:25. Click on this Timestamp from the pull down menu on the righthand side of the web page.
Have people died from ‘long covid’?
The deniers of vaccine harm have only two ways of addressing the excess death problem. They either deny that it exists or try to blame it on covid or ‘long covid’. HART have previously addressed why covid is not an adequate explanation for the problem because the timing of the non-covid excess has been synchronous in places that had no significant covid until 2022.
Cancer concerns
The covid vaccines skipped safety testing for cancer risk. Pfizer said genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and biodistribution studies were “not considered necessary.” Even while their trial info sheet said “Due to the urgent need for a vaccine against Covid-19, with agreement from the MHRA, some of the tests usually required for a newly manufactured vaccine have been modified, in order to make the vaccine available more quickly for assessment.”
Pick of the week – 19 April 2024
This week’s top picks from our members
Censorship & persecution of dissident voices continues across the world
Those who, like the members of HART, have been speaking out for three or four years about the perils of lockdowns, the lack of access to proper medical care and the utter debacle of the unsafe and ineffective vaccines, keep hoping the tide is turning. But for every stone upturned another boulder seems to descend to crush the truth.
What authority would scare and shame an already frightened population?
In the knowledge that people are already in a state of heightened anxiety, what government would choose to further frighten and shame them? When citizens have amended their lifestyles in order to function under difficult circumstances, what government would seek to actively disrupt these necessary and understandable adaptations?
Have the MHRA admitted causation for any vaccine harm?
The MHRA are far too slow to react to harm and admit causation. There is a history here. When the 2009 swine flu vaccine caused narcolepsy the UK institutions were very slow to react. It was Scandinavian countries who highlighted the problem in 2010. That year the MHRA were measuring for other effects but not narcolepsy. In 2011, they said they needed to await epidemiological studies. It took until 2013 before Public Health England admitted a problem in the UK.
Medical Ethics have gone AWOL…again!!
Regular HART readers may remember last summer, we highlighted problems with a trial of a new Moderna mRNA booster which was recruiting in the US and the UK including healthy children from 12 years upwards. A letter was sent by the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council, signed by 125 health professionals and academics, to the CEOs and Chairmen of the 35 UK centres involved, pointing out the emotionally charged recruitment leaflet, the lack of compliance with Helsinki Agreement, and even the offer of money to children on trial completion, in contravention of research governance guidance.
