We are publishing in full a letter from a HART supporter to his MP and his Senned member. There are so many people working hard trying to highlight the awfulness of the last 5 years to their elected representatives but mostly it seems to fall on deaf ears. But do keep them coming …
Tag: vaccines

My four-year inquisition for writing the truth on Covid-19 vaccine data
Niall McCrae was reported to the NMC by a ‘factchecker’ in March 2021 for a single article he had written, reporting on the phenomenon of increased civd infections in the first 10 days after vaccination (as published in a report from Public Health England). For this crime, he waited 4 years when on the first date of the hearing the NMC’s own legal team threw it out before Niall’s lawyer had even opened his mouth!

Is the FDA a mutinous ship?
Is the new FDA team just a re-branding of the old team. Moderna’s mNEXSPIKE covid jab approval looks like more of the same..

An Evidence-based approach to Covid-19 Vaccination??
Last week the HHS announced the end to covid vaccines in children and pregnant women, but the updates on the CDC website are not consistent with the announcements. The article looks at some inconsistencies in the message…

Watson et al debunked?
Watson et al’s Lancet article claiming 14-20 million lives saved by Covid vaccines always stretched the credulity of HART members but it is still widely quoted as the gain to ofset ‘rare’ vaccine injuries. Steve Kirsch casts more doubts on the methodology used.

Another legal loss for Moderna
Moderna loses yet another legal challenge over its NextCOVE trial, the notorious study including healthy children in testing of a new booster and involving significant financial incentives. Refusing to produce the trial protocol for 2 years, they have now lost a Tribunal. This follows their embarrasing admonishment by the PMCPA..

Regarding the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme – An Open Letter to the Press
HART publishes two letters from Jonathan Hall to the Press regarding their lack of detailed investigation of the woefull inadequate Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme.

Covid vaccine injured – Silent no More
Was taking the Covid vaccine Worth a Shot? A new book by Caroline Pover, written on behalf of Brianne Dressen who lives in the USA, chronicles the horrific story of how she was severely injured by the Covid vaccine after enrolling on the AstraZeneca trial in November 2020. Caroline sensitively and professionally tells the heart wrenching, eye-opening account of how Brianne Dressen’s life was turned upside down and irreversibly changed forever the day she chose to volunteer to enroll on the UK-led AstraZeneca clinical trial. This book takes the reader along the rollercoaster ride of the devastating injuries caused by the vaccine and the blatant abuse of power by the healthcare system to denigrate, ignore, and cover up her injuries – along with many others labelled – as ‘misinformation’ spreaders by the medical-industrial-military complex.

Covid Inquiry Module 4 revisited
This is a detailed report from the People’s Vaccine Inquiry meeting in London on 4th February, which aimed to highlight omissions and distortions from the official Public Inquiry.

The Flawed Assessment of VDPS Claims
The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) is often portrayed as a financial lifeline for those suffering from vaccine-related injuries. However, upon closer examination, the system appears fundamentally flawed, leaving many without the support they desperately need. Instead of functioning as a proper compensation scheme, the VDPS serves as a temporary measure, intended only to provide interim financial assistance until claimants can pursue legal redress. Given the significant legal barriers and reluctance of courts to hear such cases in the UK, this supposed route to justice remains largely inaccessible.

People’s Vaccine Inquiry Press Conference
Members of the People’s Vaccine Inquiry held a Press Conference in London at the end of the UK Covid-19 Public Inquiry, Module 4 hearings. The aim was to look at many of the omissions and misinformation of the official Inquiry and give a public voice to the many dissenting health professionals and others who are far from convinced that these products

One million chickens culled
One million chilckens culled at a family farm in Shrophire and England and Scotland now labelled as an Avian Influenza Prevention Zone (AIPZ). Is this the fearporn starting all over?

Module 4 Vaccines and therapeutics, HART report Chapter 3
Furthe updates from the Public Inquiry

Smoke, mirrors and ghost writers
Smoke and Mirrors in scientific debate. All is not always what it seems and authors are not always who they purport to be.

UK Covid-19 Public Inquiry – Chapter 2
Module 4 – days 2-4
More depressing views from the Vaccine Module. Vaccine hesitancy and misinformation were the order of the day.

UK Covid-19 Public Inquiry – chapter 1
Module 4, report from day 1 of the hearings to which we are not invited. HART was one of a number of groups who were asked to provide detailed witness statements to the Inquiry, only to find we will not be called to give oral evidence. The Inquiry legal team have apparently shared our statements with the Core Participants and indeed with one of their commissioned experts, but have not as yet confirmed whether or not our statements will be available on the Inquiry website.
Preliminary statements from day 1 are not encouraging!

From the ‘Correspondence Officer’ at DHSC
A belated reply from an unnamed ‘Correspondence Officer’ claims that “The benefits of the vaccines in preventing COVID-19 and serious complications associated with COVID-19 far outweigh any currently known side effects in the vast majority of patients.” This confidence is certainly not shared by HART nor by the many countries now involved in the NORTHgroup.

UK joins the NORTH group to write to the PM
UK group joins 9 other countries writing to their prime ministers to highligh the DNA contamination and other hazards of mRNA vaccines and to demand thier withdrawal.