The publication of the trial results that led to initial approvals claimed there had been four deaths in the placebo group and only two in the vaccination group. By the time of the publication of the 6 month follow up data the ratio was 15 in the vaccination group and 14 in the placebo group. However, this was not the full story and more evidence emerged subsequently.
COVID-19
Whatever happened to the AstraZeneca FOI?
One year ago, PJH Law, on behalf of HART, made a Freedom of Information request to the Medicines and Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency (MHRA), requiring all the data that was submitted by AstraZeneca in the application for licence of their Covid-19 vaccine.
Pick of the week
A selection of articles that we feel you will find worth the time.
A closer look at deaths in Australia in 2021
Australia is an important control group because they had minimal covid prior to Omicron. Therefore the effects of the vaccine alone on the population can be deduced by what happened there in 2021.
Pick of the week
A selection of articles that we feel are worth the time. ‘What should we learn for the future?’ Dr Scott Michell, The Guernsey press, 9th October: Dr Mitchell was an Emergency Care Physician at Princess Elizabeth Hospital in Guernsey. He became a member of the Frontline Covid Clinical Care Clinicians(FLCCC) and has signed many of HART‘s open letters cautioning against rolling out mRNA vaccines to children.
Another look at the post vaccination danger period
In 2021, HART raised the alarm about an increased risk of covid infection in the first two weeks after vaccination from multiple sources. The result was that those who were susceptible to the circulating variant, had their cases within two weeks of vaccination resulting in a lower infection risk in the period more than two weeks after vaccination. This created the illusion of efficacy.
Covid 19 Inquiry
HART members are not the only people to be shocked at the double standards applied to three professors all appearing before Baroness Hallett last week. This topic has been covered in the Daily Sceptic and of course by Tom Jefferson in Trust the Evidence. But you really have to watch at least part of the day’s YouTube coverage to get a sense of the level of disrespect shown to Professor Carl Heneghan.
Why did the minister reference Singapore?
In the study they critically fail to define “unvaccinated”. However, a clue comes from the fact that the sum of the “unvaccinated,” and those with two doses or three doses equals every one who tested positive (see figure 1). This presumably means that everyone who had been vaccinated but had not yet been “fully vaccinated” were described as “unvaccinated”. Of those who tested positive 91.5% were “fully vaccinated” or more.
Pick of the week
Following on from last week’s round up, here is another small selection of the numerous excellent articles out there.
Weekly news round up
There can be an overwhelming amount of information crossing you various indie newsfeeds each day. Here we have selected a few articles that we think worthy of your attention.
State overreach in medical decisions
Two weeks ago, a 19-year-old young woman lay in a hospital bed with a court injunction in place that prevented her from giving her own name in a newspaper article. She described being in “a race against time to escape from this system and the certain death it wishes to impose on me.”
Why HART uses the virus model
There are two separate debates about interpretations of covid.
One is that there was no “novel virus”. The key point being about the novelty. This was used by governments to suggest a lack of prior immunity, with a number of far-reaching implications, so it seems justifiable to “hold their feet to the fire” and assess novelty on this basis.
The vaccine injured get their 20-minutes at the Hallett Inquiry
Last week, the Hallett Inquiry opened Module 4 on Vaccines and therapeutics. HART, UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Perseus and the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council had all separately applied for Core participant status and this had been rejected. However an undertaking has been given that the Inquiry’s legal team will contact these groups to ensure any questions and concerns will be raised.
Is the BMJ trying to redeem itself?
Censorship or self-censorship in the mainstream media, if not to say paid government propaganda, has been very clear for all to see. But reading the comments at the bottom of online articles can give a more encouraging picture of the views of the readership.
Previously unbelievable levels of conflicts of interest are now commonplace
As described by Nick Hunt in this Daily Sceptic piece, one of the (many) odd features of the MHRA’s approval of the products knows as “covid vaccines” is the fact that when Jonathan Van Tam (the UK’s Deputy Chief Medical Officer) wrote to June Raine (head of the MHRA – the UK’s medicines regulator) in November 2020 asking about the suitability of the Pfizer/BionTech product for approval, the reply was not from June Raine, or anyone else at the MHRA
Concerns over the covid mRNA injections keep coming
One of the most egregious missteps (a word which might be construed as generous) by drug regulators around the world was to allow the MRNA injections to proceed through a pathway reserved for the class of products termed vaccines.
Professor Lim, how can boosters protect others?
Professor Lim, how can boosters protect others?
Where is the logic or indeed the ethics of the autumn booster programme?
Problem-Reaction-Solution
For those of us who started pulling uncomfortable threads of ‘hang on a minute, that doesn’t seem quite right’ and kept going, life is now a strange landscape. When it comes to health beliefs, many of us have had assumptions believed for our entire lifetime smashed to smithereens.
