The deniers of vaccine harm have only two ways of addressing the excess death problem. They either deny that it exists or try to blame it on covid or ‘long covid’. HART have previously addressed why covid is not an adequate explanation for the problem because the timing of the non-covid excess has been synchronous in places that had no significant covid until 2022.
News
Cancer concerns
The covid vaccines skipped safety testing for cancer risk. Pfizer said genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and biodistribution studies were “not considered necessary.” Even while their trial info sheet said “Due to the urgent need for a vaccine against Covid-19, with agreement from the MHRA, some of the tests usually required for a newly manufactured vaccine have been modified, in order to make the vaccine available more quickly for assessment.”
Censorship & persecution of dissident voices continues across the world
Those who, like the members of HART, have been speaking out for three or four years about the perils of lockdowns, the lack of access to proper medical care and the utter debacle of the unsafe and ineffective vaccines, keep hoping the tide is turning. But for every stone upturned another boulder seems to descend to crush the truth.
What authority would scare and shame an already frightened population?
In the knowledge that people are already in a state of heightened anxiety, what government would choose to further frighten and shame them? When citizens have amended their lifestyles in order to function under difficult circumstances, what government would seek to actively disrupt these necessary and understandable adaptations?
Have the MHRA admitted causation for any vaccine harm?
The MHRA are far too slow to react to harm and admit causation. There is a history here. When the 2009 swine flu vaccine caused narcolepsy the UK institutions were very slow to react. It was Scandinavian countries who highlighted the problem in 2010. That year the MHRA were measuring for other effects but not narcolepsy. In 2011, they said they needed to await epidemiological studies. It took until 2013 before Public Health England admitted a problem in the UK.
Medical Ethics have gone AWOL…again!!
Regular HART readers may remember last summer, we highlighted problems with a trial of a new Moderna mRNA booster which was recruiting in the US and the UK including healthy children from 12 years upwards. A letter was sent by the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council, signed by 125 health professionals and academics, to the CEOs and Chairmen of the 35 UK centres involved, pointing out the emotionally charged recruitment leaflet, the lack of compliance with Helsinki Agreement, and even the offer of money to children on trial completion, in contravention of research governance guidance.
Pick of the Week: 29/03/2024
This week’s selection of articles 🔗 The Curious Case of Hydroxychloroquine: Professor Robert Clancy, Quadrant Online, 5th March 2024 This article is based on a talk Robert Clancy gave at a conference entitled “Medicine at the Crossroads in the Covid Era”. In seeking for a theme for his talk he decided, “few topics could be […]
When money and ethics collide
Last month, HART wrote an article on the spring booster programme, including linking to an article in Chemist+Druggist on the pending availability of private covid vaccines in pharmacies up and down the land. A company called Pharmadoctor was the first into the ring but has been followed by others including Boots, the oldest of the UK high street chemists, whose strapline on their website is: We serve your wellbeing for life.
A Letter to the CEO of Boots the Chemist
If the NHS does not advise giving a vaccine, how is it ethical to sell them? 27th March 2024 To: Sebastian James, CEO, Boots UK; Graham Thoms, CEO, Pharmadoctor Dear Mr James and Mr Thoms, Re: Private Covid-19 vaccines for healthy children I am writing to draw your attention urgently to the major breach of […]
The Smallpox vanishing Act
The primary beliefs of vaccinology are that it is possible to educate the immune system to protect against disease, that vaccines are safe and that smallpox was eradicated. It is quite possible to be very confident about the first points and still be able to question the evidence for the last one.
BIT Coining it – The private profiteering of state-sponsored propaganda
Once upon a time (2010 to be precise), somewhat unexpectedly in a Rose Garden in Westminster, a bromance blossomed. The honeymoon couple – call them Cameron and Clegg – fell out of love in short order, but the unhappy union limped on for a fixed term of five years and a day, during which time many a policy decision was made that was neither fish nor fowl, neither blue nor yellow.
Vaccine injury support group get charitable status
UK CV Family is a peer-support group set up in 2021 by two vaccine-injured women, Charlet Crighton and Caroline Pover. Along with Vaccine Injured & Bereaved UK (VIBUK), they have faced an uphill battle in getting recognition. However, UK CV Family has recently been granted charitable status.
Gove’s Ministry of Truth Reporting for Duty
For those paying attention to the rising tide of totalitarianism here in the UK, the latest from The Ministry of Truth, AKA HM Government should really make your blood run cold. Michael Gove has now overseen the redefining of extremism.
The legal landscape is evolving rapidly
It is pleasing to see that, as the fear of the “covid pandemic” recedes, people around the world are starting to look seriously at legal redress for harms caused, and fundamental rights breached, by the myriad evidence-free but catastrophically harmful measures imposed by governments on their citizens.
Confusion reigns between “indemnity” and “immunity”
We sporadically hear of vaccine injury cases in the UK being contemplated or even launched against covid vaccine manufacturers. We also frequently hear people say that “the covid vaccine manufacturers cannot be sued as they have an indemnity”.
