UK Parliamentary debate on Excess Mortality but will MPs attend?
News
PRESS RELEASE: Statement from HART, DFPUK & UKMFA
This joint statement is in response to attempts by a group of doctors and the Good Law Project to compel the GMC to investigate Dr Aseem Malhotra, as reported in this article on the 5th June 2023.
We have drafted this statement to demonstrate that there is a significant body of doctors in support of Dr Malhotra; who are strongly opposed to and concerned about this case and its ramifications for the medical profession as a whole.
Pick of the week
Following on from last week’s round up, here is another small selection of the numerous excellent articles out there.
Five questions for the government’s behavioural scientists
As proposed in a previous HART article, state-funded behavioural scientists – via their application of often-covert ‘nudge’ techniques – fulfil a crucial role in imposing the will of a global elite upon ordinary people. Whether it is confining us to our homes, encouraging the ingestion of insects, imposing digital IDs or restricting our opportunities to travel, the nudgers promote the compliance of the masses by a variety of means, including their stealthy harnessing of fear, shaming and peer pressure.
Elegant modelling of excess deaths
Joel Smalley has carried out extensive analysis on a dataset which has allowed for the most accurate excess death data so far produced. There is a huge, previously unaddressed issue, of grouping cohorts when calculating excess deaths. There is huge variation in the size of the cohorts born each year.
Excess Deaths Adjournment Debate
Andrew Bridgen has secured an adjournment debate on the vital subject of Excess Mortality. This much vexed subject has generally been ignored by the majority of MPs as well as the mainstream media. The excess noted back in 2021 in adolescent males was highlighted in the High Court and the excess was acknowledged even then but with no decision to investigate. HART wrote to the MHRA at that time, as did members of the Pandemic Recovery APPG. Questions have been asked in the House of Commons too. But all attempts to get the issue taken seriously have drawn a blank.
DNA contaminants – an ‘accident’ too far?
The presence of foreign DNA in the genome can cause various complications, with cancer being the most notable risk. This cancer risk arises from the potential of the foreign DNA to disrupt the genes that prevent uncontrolled growth and control correct any mutations in the DNA. There is also a potential risk of integrating into the genome of sperm and egg cells and impacting on the health of future generations.
More circus theatre from the ‘safe and effective’ brigade
On 2nd October 2023, Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman were awarded a Nobel Prize for their contribution to the design of the mRNA vaccines. Notably, the original inventor, Robert Malone was not included. Karikó and Weissman’s main contribution was to include a synthetic nucleotide – pseudouridine – to reduce immune attack, increase protein production and to increase the longevity of the mRNA. How long did they make it last you may ask? Nobody knows.
Joint open letter to MPs retiring in 2024
How will you be remembered? Also available on Substack – Come and join the conversation with open comments A Word version of the letter available for download HERE for those who readers would also like to forward to their MP to ensure response. Letter to all Members of Parliament standing down at the next General […]
Weekly news round up
There can be an overwhelming amount of information crossing you various indie newsfeeds each day. Here we have selected a few articles that we think worthy of your attention.
Primodos: another example of MHRA’s failure to “put patients first”
Most people are aware of Thalidomide, many are aware of Valproate, but there are several other drugs that have caused birth defects in children that are less well known including Debendox, Carbimazole and Primodos.
Why are we so afraid of 1918?
Everytime someone tries to whip up a frenzy about a new bug the 1918 influenza pandemic will be referenced. People will say there were a huge number of deaths including of the young and therefore you must be terrified. But what if this whole story was not what it seems?
How many people really died in the Moderna trial?
Death is known as a “hard” outcome because it is totally objective. It is also clearly an important outcome. So what happened to the participants in the Moderna trial. How many died? It depends when and where you look. Here are the results chronologically.
State overreach in medical decisions
Two weeks ago, a 19-year-old young woman lay in a hospital bed with a court injunction in place that prevented her from giving her own name in a newspaper article. She described being in “a race against time to escape from this system and the certain death it wishes to impose on me.”
Why HART uses the virus model
There are two separate debates about interpretations of covid.
One is that there was no “novel virus”. The key point being about the novelty. This was used by governments to suggest a lack of prior immunity, with a number of far-reaching implications, so it seems justifiable to “hold their feet to the fire” and assess novelty on this basis.
MMR and threats to quarantine perfectly healthy children
On 14th September BBC News reported London measles warning ‘Outbreak could hit tens of thousands’ Reading on, you discover this is based on our favourite dislocation from the real world: computer modelling.
The vaccine injured get their 20-minutes at the Hallett Inquiry
Last week, the Hallett Inquiry opened Module 4 on Vaccines and therapeutics. HART, UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Perseus and the Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council had all separately applied for Core participant status and this had been rejected. However an undertaking has been given that the Inquiry’s legal team will contact these groups to ensure any questions and concerns will be raised.
Is the BMJ trying to redeem itself?
Censorship or self-censorship in the mainstream media, if not to say paid government propaganda, has been very clear for all to see. But reading the comments at the bottom of online articles can give a more encouraging picture of the views of the readership.
