Over the last few decades we have seen sound liberal principles become distorted and perverted until they are not worthy principles any more. In fact, many such perverted principles have run roughshod over other fundamental principles.
Posts
WHO Decides? Part 2: Data
Nation states have only months to decide not to commit to the amended WHO International Health Regulations and the Treaty that accompanies them. In part 1, we discussed the impact on your money, and here we will talk about the effect on your data, your privacy and your freedom.
WHO Decides? Part 1: Money
The world is at a crucial crossroads with imminent changes to the World Health Organisation (WHO). Many are aware of a proposed new treaty and maybe even the changes to the International Health Regulations, but what people might not be aware of are the plans for your money. Beliefs about what happened with covid are not relevant to this discussion. You could think that covid was the biggest public health disaster in history and these plans should still concern you.
Referral to the Counter Disinformation Unit – by whom?
The Telegraph has suddenly reported on the existence of the Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU), the dubious activities of which were first highlighted several months ago by Big Brother Watch in a report aptly titled ‘The Ministry of Truth’ (do re-read George Orwell’s 1984 if you don’t recognise this title). A launch meeting was held in January at Westminster, hosted by David Davis MP, who had himself been reported to the CDU for unspecified crimes. Where were the press reports of that meeting?
The perils of blind faith in men
In 430 BC, a devastating plague ravaged Athens, a city embroiled in the Peloponnesian War under the leadership of the statesman Pericles. Simultaneously, Sophocles’ tragic play Oedipus Rex was unveiled, serving as a metaphorical commentary on the events unfolding in Athens.
The impact of the covid response upon workplace absenteeism
The Office of National Statistics has estimated that, in 2022, 185.6 million working days were lost due to sickness, the highest figure recorded since records began. The British economy loses £43 billion a year from this growing ‘disease burden’, with around a third of this strain being attributed to mental health problems.
Querying the existence of a covid ‘pandemic’
The word pandemic used to have a very specific meaning. It was used to describe a scenario where there was extensive incapacitation of key workers and large numbers of deaths, including young people. A genuine pandemic is not something that would have needed billions of dollars in advertising for people to even notice and fear. Using this long-established definition of the word, we conclude that there was in fact no pandemic in 2020. The word was deliberately misapplied and weaponised against an unsuspecting public.
A line in the sand for euthanasia
It is easy to make an argument for euthanasia. Heart wrenching stories can be told about people who are suffering terribly and genuinely want to see their already imminent death hastened. The argument for not crossing this line is because as soon as it is crossed there is a very slippery slope on the other side. Canada has demonstrated this in a most tragic way.
Reply from the MHRA regarding children’s covid vaccinations
The data on the safety of the vaccine in the 12 to 15 year olds have also been reviewed carefully. No new adverse events were identified and the safety data in adolescents was comparable with that seen in young adults.
Glimmers of judicial pushback in the USA
Amid all the gloom and evidence of top-to-toe captured institutions worldwide, there are some glimmers of effective pushback emerging from the USA. Here are a few examples from opposite ends of the judicial system.
Has there been a real rise in atrial fibrillation?
There looks to have been manipulation of NHS data tables for diagnoses. Recent news items reported on a rise in atrial fibrillation but no one seemed to pin down when this escalation truly began. Could it have been due to covid virus or the covid vaccines? These are critical questions so I went to hunt down the data and see for myself.
BMJ joins the ‘misinformation’ circus
The BMJ published an article on 5 May entitled ‘We need a gold standard for randomised control trials studying misinformation and vaccine hesitancy on social media’. This lends yet more weight to the thesis set out in our article relating current events to the Orwell 1984 classic. Here we have yet another example of Newspeak trying to eradicate dangerous Wrongthink, in one of the supposedly most ‘prestigious’ Science journals.
Roll up, Roll up: mRNA vaccines for ‘high risk’ 0-4s available
Followers of the HART bulletins will know that an open letter was sent to the FDA right back in April 2022 before their meeting to consider authorising mRNA covid-19 vaccines to young children aged 6 months to 4 years. The authors highlighted the likely poor benefit:risk ratio, given the extremely low risk posed by SARS-CoV-2 infections in this age group and the many known and unknown harms.
The three icebergs of vaccine injury
Within the first year the tips of three icebergs had been recognised and acknowledged by authorities. These tips were the risk of myocarditis, the risk of unusual brain clots and the risk of Guillain-Barre syndrome (where the immune system attacks the nervous system leading to life threatening or disabling weakness or paralysis). However, these are only the tips of icebergs the full extent of which are yet to be measured.
To Do List: Re-read George Orwell’s 1984 and take detailed notes
Using particular labels has become the unbeatable weapon du jour of online warfare. If you successfully brand someone a racist, a conspiracy theorist, an anti-vaxxer, alt-right or an antisemite (ideally several of these at once), you neutralise everything-they-ever-said-ever. Boom. Done. You’re finished. Next.
Unreasonably Spiked
There are times when it seems that nothing will ever be the same again. Many of us long to go back to normal life where we can work, play, pay our taxes and observe professional scribes and commentators vociferously debate the arguments du jour. But when it gets to the stage where even pachyderm enthusiasts are consistently ignoring gigantic herds of elephants stampeding around them, their active cognitive dissonance and Nelsonian ignorance is nothing short of enraging.
Blunted
Spiked has published a spiteful article by Fraser Myers that claims HART is “notorious for its anti-vax statements”. This follows a debate between him and Andrew Bridgen MP on GB News in which Bridgen brought along facts and Myers repeated the phrase “anti-vax conspiracy theory” numerous times.
Dictating to a virus
The recent announcement by Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), declaring the covid pandemic over, highlights the absurdity of bureaucratic regimes dictating when we should be scared or not scared of an endemic virus.
