11th August 2022 Your ref DE-1411619 Dear Mr X, Thank you for your detailed reply on behalf of the Secretary of State, but unfortunately it totally fails to address the concerns outlined in our recent letter. You start with a statement ‘Vaccines are now safer than ever before’. Can you explain if that is the […]
Vaccine
Open letter to JCVI 9th December 2021
Why give a second dose to children? Professor Lim, Chairman, JCVI COVID-19 subcommittee Dr June Raine, Chief Executive, MHRA Rt Hon Sajid Javid, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Professor Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer for England Sir Patrick Vallance, Government Chief Scientific Adviser Dr Jenny Harries, Chief Executive, UKHSA 9th December 2021 […]
Open letter to JCVI 6th June 2021
Professor Wei Shen Lim, Chairman, Covid-19 immunisation committee, Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) Dear Professor Lim, I and 50 senior doctors and academics, wrote to you urgently on 17th May (linked here) to express our grave concerns about the possibility of the COVID-19 vaccination programme being extended to children. I was informed that the letter […]
Series of studies from South Korea raise serious concerns
In September we wrote an article explaining that because the harms from the injections known as “covid vaccines” would manifest in inflammatory or autoimmune conditions, there is a risk that they may go unnoticed as the adverse events will be spread across many organ systems, as well as occurring over an extended period.
Pfizer sued… what about BioNTech?
As we wrote in the last HART bulletin’s Pick of the Week, we are encouraged that legal cases are starting to appear, even if ‘victories’ have been few and far between. We should certainly be wary of getting our hopes up and being fooled by ‘dead cat’ distractions. After all, what are the perpetrators of this fiasco up to while we are fed the latest distraction?
Do entire populations really need flu & covid shots every winter?
The CDC advice for this autumn is for everyone over 6 months of age to have a flu vaccine and a covid vaccine. Moreover if you are a baby, or a ‘pregnant person’ or an over-60, why not throw in RSV protection too? You’ll be pleased to know you can get all three shots on the same day, three for the price of one! What could possibly go wrong?
Another measure of the vaccines’ evident failure is being flagrantly ignored
Before Public Health England became UKHSA they devised a way of measuring the proportion of household contacts who were ill a few days later – the secondary attack rate. Many publications on secondary attack rates claim very high percentages but fail to exclude people within a household who became ill at the same time as each other and should both be considered primary cases. Public Health England did exclude these situations and found very consistent results as a consequence.
Were covid vaccine trials misleading by design?
The covid vaccine trials did not focus on how many were healthy instead comparing those who developed disease. To take the Pfizer/BioNTech trial as an example, there were 8 PCR positive symptomatic people in the vaccine group and 162 in the placebo group more than a week after the second dose and after up to 2 month’s follow up. That worked out at a 94.6% efficacy when calculated as a percentage reduction.
Further mining of VAERS data confirms many suspected issues
An independent researcher called Craig Paardekooper recently gave a video presentation to Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International. Much of what Craig says is confirmation of the adverse event profile we have come to understand of the injections known as “covid vaccines”.
Ignored danger signals
The publication of the trial results that led to initial approvals claimed there had been four deaths in the placebo group and only two in the vaccination group. By the time of the publication of the 6 month follow up data the ratio was 15 in the vaccination group and 14 in the placebo group. However, this was not the full story and more evidence emerged subsequently.
Whatever happened to the AstraZeneca FOI?
One year ago, PJH Law, on behalf of HART, made a Freedom of Information request to the Medicines and Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency (MHRA), requiring all the data that was submitted by AstraZeneca in the application for licence of their Covid-19 vaccine.
Another look at the post vaccination danger period
In 2021, HART raised the alarm about an increased risk of covid infection in the first two weeks after vaccination from multiple sources. The result was that those who were susceptible to the circulating variant, had their cases within two weeks of vaccination resulting in a lower infection risk in the period more than two weeks after vaccination. This created the illusion of efficacy.
Pick of the week
A selection of articles that we feel you will find worth the time.
PRESS RELEASE: Statement from HART, DFPUK & UKMFA
This joint statement is in response to attempts by a group of doctors and the Good Law Project to compel the GMC to investigate Dr Aseem Malhotra, as reported in this article on the 5th June 2023.
We have drafted this statement to demonstrate that there is a significant body of doctors in support of Dr Malhotra; who are strongly opposed to and concerned about this case and its ramifications for the medical profession as a whole.
DNA contaminants – an ‘accident’ too far?
The presence of foreign DNA in the genome can cause various complications, with cancer being the most notable risk. This cancer risk arises from the potential of the foreign DNA to disrupt the genes that prevent uncontrolled growth and control correct any mutations in the DNA. There is also a potential risk of integrating into the genome of sperm and egg cells and impacting on the health of future generations.
More circus theatre from the ‘safe and effective’ brigade
On 2nd October 2023, Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman were awarded a Nobel Prize for their contribution to the design of the mRNA vaccines. Notably, the original inventor, Robert Malone was not included. Karikó and Weissman’s main contribution was to include a synthetic nucleotide – pseudouridine – to reduce immune attack, increase protein production and to increase the longevity of the mRNA. How long did they make it last you may ask? Nobody knows.
How many people really died in the Moderna trial?
Death is known as a “hard” outcome because it is totally objective. It is also clearly an important outcome. So what happened to the participants in the Moderna trial. How many died? It depends when and where you look. Here are the results chronologically.
MMR and threats to quarantine perfectly healthy children
On 14th September BBC News reported London measles warning ‘Outbreak could hit tens of thousands’ Reading on, you discover this is based on our favourite dislocation from the real world: computer modelling.
